New DOE Regulations: Can Your College Withhold Your Transcript?

On July 1, 2024, several new federal regulations went into effect in a bid by Department of Education officials to “oversee predatory and low-quality institutions of post-secondary education”.

            Perhaps the most prominent change is that federal regulations no longer permit colleges that receive federal financial aid to withhold transcripts for course credits paid for with federal money. As it would be extremely difficult for institutions to determine which credits in a student’s transcript were paid for with federal funds, and subsequently to solely release transcripts with those courses, it is likely that this change to the federal regulation will amount to a national ban on the practice of withholding student transcripts when there is a balance owed by the student.

            Students throughout the United States have struggled to get their higher education institution to release their transcript because they owe a balance to the institution. This phenomenon creates stranded credits, or academic credits that a student has earned but which cannot be verified due to the institution’s refusal to release the transcript. If a student cannot get their transcript, they cannot prove the credits they have earned to any other institution and have to start over if they wish to continue their education elsewhere. According to the 2024 Transcript Regulation Impact Survey (TRIS) by the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers, there are 6.5 million people in the United States with stranded credits with roughly $15 billion in debt owed to higher education institutions.

            This practice of withholding transcripts is utilized by higher education institutions to force students to pay the debts owed on their balance in order to have access to the formal record of their academic progress. This practice disproportionately impacts low-income students and students of color, and further bolsters inequities in the education system. Encouraging institutions to stop engaging in this predatory practice is one thing the Department of Education can do to help students that are struggling under the burden of student debt.

            Students aren’t out of the woods yet, though: several of the new regulations are already facing legal challenges, and whether this particular regulation remains in place will likely depend on how federal courts interpret the recent Supreme Court ruling in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which curtailed Chevron[1] deference and substantially limited the regulatory power of federal agencies.

            If you are a student struggling to get your higher education institution to release your transcript due to a balance owed, we recommend you consult with an attorney to see if you can use these new regulations to your advantage and get your transcript released to you.

Written by education attorney, Megan Mitchell at Abdnour Weiker, LLP

www.Lawyers4Students.com

---

[1] In Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council,  the Supreme Court held that when a legislative delegation to an administrative/regulatory agency was not explicit but was implicit, the court could not substitute their own interpretation of the statute for a reasonable interpretation by the agency. This case created what is known as Chevron deference, wherein courts deferred to federal agencies on their reasonable interpretations of the regulatory statutes. In the recent decision in Loper, the Supreme Court has effectively put an end to the practice of Chevron deference.

Student Privacy Rights Under FERPA: What To Do If Your Student’s Privacy Is Violated

Most parents are aware that their students have some privacy rights that schools must take appropriate action to protect. However, many parents are not aware of what establishes those privacy rights and, perhaps more important to parents, what can be done to protect them.

The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) was adopted in 1974 as a Congressional response to the abuse of student records nationwide. FERPA serves two main functions: 1) guarantee access to students records for both students and parents; 2) limit third-party access to student records.

When processing a records request, a school must determine whether the materials requested qualify as education record materials. An “education record” includes records, files, documents and other materials, which: (1) contain information related to a student; and (2) are maintained by an educational institution. This includes things like a student’s academic work, test scores, psychological records, and family background. An education record does not include things like personal notes of a teacher or counselor, personnel records or law enforcement records.

So what happens when a student’s school releases part of their education record to a third party in violation of FERPA? One of the most common questions we receive is how parents can sue their child’s school for violating FERPA. Unfortunately, they cannot. FERPA creates no private right of action in the event of a school violation, meaning individuals cannot sue for a violation in court. Instead, in the event of a FERPA violation, a parent or student may file a Complaint with the Student Privacy Policy Office (SPPO) of the Department of Education alleging a violation.

A Complaint must be filed within six months of the violation, or within six months of when parents first knew or should have known of the violation. In this process, timeliness is key. Following a complaint, the SPPO will determine whether the school violated FERPA, and whether the school has a practice or policy of violating FERPA.

If the SPPO finds that a school has a practice or policy of violating FERPA, SPPO will then provide steps that the school must take to comply and provide a reasonable period to comply. If a school still does not comply, SPPO may withhold further payments made under any federal program and either issue a cease-and-desist letter or terminate federal funding.

Although there is no private cause of action guaranteed under FERPA it is still important that parents make their voices heard through the SPPO Complaint process. When facing the restriction or elimination of federal funding, schools will typically clean up their act with regard to maintaining FERPA-protected information. If you believe your child’s private, FERPA-protected information has been wrongfully distributed by their school, we encourage you to file a complaint with the SPPO and make your voice heard.

For more information about FERPA, check out the Special Education Legal Clinic’s FERPA video: SELC Understanding FERPA. Further SELC Workshops on other topics are also available.

Megan Mitchell is an education attorney in Michigan at Abdnour Weiker, LLP

www.Lawyers4Students.com

Board of Education Candidates in Ohio Can Be Surprised by State Law Disqualifying Some Candidates from Serving

School board elections are incredibly important to voters because of the direct impact that these elected officials could have on a family. Given the importance of these elections, it is surprising that one Ohio law disqualifying board of education candidates from serving on the board is not more known and understood.

According to Section 3313.33(B) of the Ohio Revised Code, no school board member shall have, “directly or indirectly, any pecuniary interest in any contract of the board.” What is a pecuniary interest?

In a 2014 Opinion, the Ohio Attorney General defined a “pecuniary interest” as simply an interest involving money. This law is certainly triggered when a school board member owns a company that does business in some capacity with the school district in which they serve. This makes sense.

However, this law also prohibits a school board member from being employed at a company that does business with the school district. In a 1999 Opinion, the Ohio Attorney General determined that a mere employment relationship is enough to trigger this rule. This is the case even if the employee’s specific duties and compensation are not directly linked to the contract with the district. The OAG reasoned that the existence, operation, and staffing level of the employer may be affected by the funds that are received from the school district. Even a pecuniary interest that is “small” and “indistinct” is enough to bar these relationships.

So, what happens when a school board member is simultaneously employed by a company that does business with the school district? In the same 2014 Opinion, the OAG explained that whenever a board member takes action in any matter in which he/she has a pecuniary interest, that action is void. Depending on the nature of the matter, this can have a substantial impact on the school district in which the member is serving.

For this reason, it is imperative that board of education candidates know the law and understand whether it disqualifies them from serving on the board of education.

What College Students Should Know About Off-Campus (Mis)Conduct

Most students know that their college or university can impose sanctions for their on-campus misconduct. What students may not know, however, is that their actions off-campus, including at home or on break, could also lead to sanctions.

Colleges and universities have expressed an interest in regulating students’ off-campus behaviors for a variety of reasons. First, universities want to protect their reputations as reputable institutions of higher learning and may discipline students for their off-campus misconduct to deter future behaviors that are contrary to their values and/or breach their codes of professional conduct. Second, certain kinds of off-campus behavior pose risks to other students’ safety and well-being—such as underage drinking, harassment, discrimination, violence, and drug abuse— and universities intervene to protect the campus community at large from these threats. Lastly, as social media use expands, it is increasingly difficult for universities to tell where on-campus behavior ends and off-campus behavior begins, so officials will sanction students more readily overall for uploading offensive content or engaging in cyberbullying.

Although no bright-line standard exists to predict precisely when a university will exercise jurisdiction, it is generally understood that the university disciplinary process can come into play where the student’s off-campus conduct “impacts the mission” of the institution or “causes substantial disruption” to the university community. As long as the school can demonstrate that there is a link between the off-campus behavior and the on-campus environment, it is permissible for the school to apply its code of conduct to these incidents.

However, it is important to know that, as of 2020, Title IX coverage does not extend to non-school-sanctioned activites occurring off-campus. Since its enactment in 1972, Title IX has prohibited sex-based discrimination, including sexual harassment, in educational activities. Under the 2020 regulations, the jurisdictional scope of Title IX has been narrowed, providing that if the alleged conduct occurs beyond the scope of an educational program, the school must dismiss the Title IX complaint. The school may still initiate its own disciplinary investigation, however, based on its own code of conduct.

Alternatively, crimes committed in a student’s hometown, while away on spring or summer break, or almost anywhere else, can follow students back to campus. This is because most schools consider their students to be representatives of their community no matter where they go. In other words, students are expected to always live in adherence to their institution’s values and morals. This is especially true for graduate or professional students. Universities can easily learn of students’ arrests or citations. So, students should err on the side of caution and be prepared for discipline that could arise from off-campus criminal acts.

Overall, university students are often held responsible for conducting themselves appropriately whether they are at home, school, or elsewhere. Whatever they may be facing, students are always encouraged to seek out legal counsel to guide them through the disciplinary process and to make sure their rights are protected at all stages of the proceedings.

Five Reasons That College Students Should Have an Education Attorney on Retainer

Going to college is an exciting time in a young person's life. It's a time of growth, learning, and independence. However, it's also a time when students may encounter legal issues they never anticipated. That's why having an education lawyer on retainer during college can be a wise decision. In this article, we'll explore the top five reasons why college students should consider having a lawyer readily available.

1. Legal Protection for Common Student Issues: College life can bring about various legal challenges, such as housing disputes, cheating allegations, code of conduct hearings, or even minor criminal matters. Having an education lawyer on retainer ensures you have expert advice when these issues arise. An education attorney can help you navigate the complexities of university policies and hearings, landlord-tenant and rommmate disputes, and even represent you in court if necessary.
2. Academic and Disciplinary Matters: College students can sometimes find themselves in situations where they face academic misconduct allegations or disciplinary (or "code of conduct" actions). College is much different than high school and the sanctions for misconduct can be severe. An education lawyer can assist you in understanding your rights, preparing your defense, and ensuring that the university follows its own procedures during disciplinary hearings.
3. Contract Review: Students often enter into agreements while in college, like leases, rental agreements, or employment contracts. A lawyer can review these contracts to ensure they are fair and protect your interests. They can also advise you on your rights and responsibilities under these agreements.
4. Criminal Charges and Offenses: Sometimes, students may find themselves on the wrong side of the law, whether it's underage drinking, drug possession, or another criminal offense. A lawyer can provide essential legal counsel, help you understand the potential consequences, and work on your defense strategy if needed. An education attorney can help you if the criminal matter results in a conduct matter with your college or university.
5. Preventive Legal Advice: Having a lawyer on retainer isn't just about reacting to legal issues; it's also about preventing them. A lawyer can provide guidance on how to stay within the bounds of the law. They can advise you on matters that may carry legal risks. Additionally, a lawyer can educate you on your rights, ensuring you understand how to protect yourself legally in various situations, from new business ventures to hosting parties to employment matters. This knowledge can be invaluable in avoiding legal troubles in the first place.

Your college's office of Student Legal Services may be able to help in certain, limited circumstances, but not when the opposing party is the university itself (like in code of conduct or academic misconduct proceedings) or another student at the university (like in a roommate dispute or Title IX hearing). Student Legal Services offices are operated by the college, and therefore they may have a conflict of interest with matters involving the college itself or other students at the college.

In conclusion, college can be an amazing time for personal and academic growth, but it's also a period when young adults may face unexpected legal challenges with serious implications. Having a private education lawyer on retainer can provide college students with a safety net and peace of mind. Lawyers can help you navigate legal issues, protect your rights, and offer guidance to prevent problems from arising in the first place.

The education lawyers at Abdnour Weiker, LLP are here to help. Our mission is to protect the rights and futures of students and educators. We operate in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Michigan.

Check us out at www.Lawyers4Students.com

Important Considerations for College Students When Using University Student Legal Services

University student legal services can be a cost-effective option for students seeking guidance and representation for routine legal matters such as traffic tickets, criminal defense, landlord-tenant disputes, employment issues and more. These university-operated services often “pool” the per-semester fees they collect from students broadly to fund the representation for the students they ultimately represent. Therefore it is a great value for students who end up needing the service. These offices are often staffed by attorneys and/or law students supervised by licensed attorneys. This service can be very beneficial, especially to students who do not have the means to hire private attorneys.

However, it is very important for college students to recognize the limitations of student legal services and the potential conflicts of interest that may arise. This happens when the opposing party in your matter is the university itself, an employee of the university, or a fellow student.

1. University legal services cannot assist you when the opposing party is the university itself.

First and foremost, university legal services cannot (and should not) assist you when the matter involves the university. It is very common for students to find themselves involved in proceedings, hearings or other disputes with their own universities. This could be in the form of academic misconduct or code of conduct hearings, university housing issues, in-state residency appeals for out-of-state students, Title IX hearings, grade appeals or even academic dismissals.

A conflict of interest arises when an organization has multiple interests that could potentially compromise its ability to fulfill the obligations impartially. When it comes to student legal services, the potential for a conflict of interest arises from the fact that these services are typically funded and/or operated by the university itself. The university's primary mission is to protect its own interests, which does not align with the interests of a student in a legal dispute against the university. Therefore, a conflict of interest exists in providing representation to a student when the opposing party is the university — or an employee of the university such as a professor or teaching assistant. To be sure, most legal services offices clearly inform students that they cannot represent them when the university or university employee is a party to the dispute. It is better for the student to seek private counsel.

2. University legal services may not be able to assist you when the opposing party is another enrolled student.

Legal matters also occur frequently for students against other students enrolled at the university. These may occur in the form of personal injury matters, car accidents, contract disputes, intellectual property disputes, roommate disputes, sexual assault claims and others.

In cases such as this, the student legal services office will likely have a conflict of interest, which is especially true if the opposing student has access to the same representation from the student legal services office. If the student legal services office does offer representation to you, be sure to ask your apoointed attorney questions about any existing conflicts — or conflicts that may arise as the matter progresses. Students should proceed very cautiously in using student legal services in these situations, to be sure that no conflict exists with the opposing student.

3. Always seek independent legal advice.

If you are facing a legal issue against your university or against a university employee, you should absolutely consult with a private attorney before taking an action that would jeopardize your rights or ability to challenge a decision later. You should also exercise caution when the matter involves another student at the university. When seeking private counsel, be sure to seek a law firm with experience in education law and student rights, such as Abdnour Weiker, LLP.

Abdnour Weiker, LLP

https://lawyers4students.com/